[中文] 《中华人民共和国反垄断法》第17条把“没有正当理由”作为认定企业滥用市场支配地位的一个前提条件。这一条款通过这一限定条件,使市场监管机构对于企业滥用市场支配地位的认定更加具体化、精细化。然而,在实务操作中,如何把握上述的“正当理由”则是一个备受争议的焦点。处理好这一问题,力争使这一争论达成共识,对于市场监管机构正确认定企业滥用市场支配地位具有重要的指导作用,有助于减少冤假错案的产生,规范市场竞争秩序,增强市场活力,促进各企业共同发展,从而更好实现经济法立法目的,促进我国经济又好又快发展。基于此,本文通过对“正当理由”的主体、主观方面、法律程序以及目的四个方面进行深入的考察,力图得出关于滥用市场支配地位的豁免事由的结论,更好地理解竞争法在价值、宗旨上的基本属性。[/中文]
[外文] Article 17 in the law of People′s Republic of China′s anti-monopoly law aims to identify "for no warrant" as a precondition for affirming abuse of dominant market position.This clause by the limited condition,makes the market regulator for affirming abuse of dominant market position more specific and refined.However,in practice,how to grasp the"warrant"is a controversial focus.Deal with this problem,and strive to make this debate into consensus has a guiding influence for market regulator to affirm the abuse of dominant market position,heiping reduce wrong convicted,standarding the order of market competition,enhancing the vitality of the market,promoting the common development of the enterprise,so as to better realize the porpose of economic law legislation,promote the sound and rapid economic development of our country.In view of this,this article through to the body of "warrant"reason、subjective aspect、legal procedure and purpose four aspects of in-depth investigation,tries hard to draw conclusions about the abuse of dominant market position of the exemption reason,better understand the basic attribute of competition law in value and objective.[/外文]
|