原文：

   Bankruptcy professionals have long viewed prepackaged bankrupty quite differently than efforts to more fully opt out of bankrupty. For decades, received wisdom has held that efforts to completely opt out of bankrupty are unenforceable, and bankruptcy lawyers have loudly condemned any suggestion that an individual or firm should be permitted to waive bankruptcy. (This is why stay waiver provisions purport to waive only the automatic stay, rather than precluding bankruptcy altogether, although the effect is essentially the same if the creditor in question is the debtor’s principal lender.) In contrast to their relentless hostility to bankruptcy waiver, bankruptcy professionals have long defended prepackaged bankruptcy. In the hearings on the 1978 Code, bankruptcy lawyers frequently praised prebankruptcy workouts and argued that the Bankruptcy Code should honor these agreements.

译文：

    从事破产的专业人士长期以来一直认为预先包装的破产与更完全的决定退出破产的努力有相当大的不同。几十年以来，大多数人认为完全退出破产的努力是不能强制实行的，并且破产律师竭力谴责允许个人或公司放弃破产的建议。（这就是为什么冻结弃权条款意味着只在自动冻结方面弃权，而不是把破产全部排除，虽然如果该债权人是债务人的主要放款人时，效果在本质上是相同的）。从事破产的专家对破产弃权毫不留情，相比之下，他们长期以来一直为预先包装的破产辩护。在关于1978年破产法的听证会上，破产律师对破产前进行的私人债务谈判频频赞赏，并且辩称破产法应该信守这些协议。

评价：