|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
中国在线翻译网>>译典论坛>> |
您是本主题第 5313 个阅读者
==
回贴倒排
|
作者
|
主题: 【新闻翻译】罗姆尼在第一场辩论后重振竞选势头 [] |
![]() After First Debate, Incumbent Faces Re-energized Challenger 罗姆尼在第一场辩论后重振竞选势头 【大家论坛】 Washington— On October 3, with fewer than 1,000 people in attendance, the Republican andDemocratic nominees to the U.S. presidency faced off in the first of threescheduled debates.
Thetrue audience for the 90-minute discussion at the University of Denver inColorado was much larger, with television viewership estimated at 60 million inthe United States and 200 million worldwide.
Overthe course of the evening, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney andPresident Obama were each trying to win the votes of U.S. citizens who have notyet decided whom to support.
In a wide-ranging exchange focused on economic issues, each candidate faced aslightly different challenge. According to political analysts, Romney, as thechallenger lagging in recent polls, needed to project leadership, carry himselfwith authority, and refute his elitist image. For Obama, the incumbentpresident and apparent front-runner at this point in the race, the challengewas to avoid mistakes and make the case for keeping his job.
In the morning after the debate, it appeared that both men succeeded, but pundits generally assessed Romney’s performance as the stronger in this debate.
“I think Romney did himself considerable good during the first debate,” William A.Galston of the Brookings Institution said in a posting to the institution’swebsite late on October 3. “I would not be surprised to learn that a majority of the American people think he won it outright. At the very least, he vastly exceeded expectations.”
Galston, now a senior fellow in the Brookings Institution’s Governance Studies Program,is a former policy adviser to President Clinton and other presidentialcandidates.
In recent U.S. political history, the challenger has tended to perform well in theopening debate, in part due to certain inherent advantages. For instance, inthe 2004 presidential debates, challenger John Kerry was widely perceived tohave trounced incumbent President George W. Bush.
Typically, a challenger has more time to devote to debate preparation, while the incumbenthas to balance prep time against the demands of a job widely acknowledged to beone of the world’s most difficult. In addition, an incumbent president hasbecome accustomed to some level of deference during four years in the nation’shighest office. The challenger, in contrast, typically achieves nomination onlyafter surviving a grueling series of debates with other presidential hopefulswithin the political party.
In the midst of parsing the fine points of tax cuts and economic projections, one particular moment in the October 3 debate stood out for viewers and took on alife of its own in social media. When Romney, with the disclaimer “I like PBS,I love Big Bird,” pledged to cut federal funding for public broadcasting, hetriggered a virtual firestorm on Twitter as the fans of the popular SesameStreet character leapt to its defense. PBS is a private, nonprofit corporation whose members are America’s publictelevision stations. These stations, supported by public funds and privatedonations, are noncommercial and provide educational programming to audiencesin all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. VirginIslands, Guam and American Samoa.
Twitter reported that, at the peak of the response, users were posting 17,000 tweetsper minute mentioning Big Bird. A spoof Twitter account, @firedbigbird, quicklywon thousands of followers.
The next televised debate, between vice presidential contenders Joe Biden and PaulRyan, will take place October 11 at Centre College in Danville, Kentucky.
Obama and Romney next will meet October 16 in a town hall–style format at Hofstra Universityin Hempstead, New York. Their final debate, this one focused on foreignaffairs, is scheduled for October 22 at Lynn University in Boca Raton, Florida.
|